What if there has been a creative partnership between two artists and one of them wishes to leave?

If one artist leaves the collaboration, can the other artist to continue the work alone?

The remaining artist should acknowledge the other collaborator’s joint authorship in some way.  Strictly speaking, the remaining artist should also secure the collaborator’s agreement for the continuation and development of this joint work; but where the collaborator has unilaterally broken the original collaborative agreement with the remaining artist (and may well owe the latter an element of the expenses incurred in making the art work), the remaining artist may wish to consider proceeding without such further agreement from the collaborator and await contact from that collaborator objecting to this being done.

In this case, the remaining artist should be in a strong bargaining position, and could, for example, insist on receiving the collaborator’s permission for the continuation and development of the joint work in exchange for the artist continuing with the project and releasing the collaborator from a breach of the original agreement and any money owed. Such an agreement would best be secured in writing signed by both artists.

Still need help? Contact us

Similar Artlaw articles

Related articles / resources

Related External Resources

Featured project

Primer on Kindle


Everything that new graduates need to know about being an artist. Primer is an ebook for new fine art graduates and emerging artists covering the things you need to consider in your first couple of ye …

Read more


This article is from the Artlaw Archive of Henry Lydiate's columns published in Art Monthly since 1976, and may contain out of date material. The article is for information only, and not for the purpose of providing legal advice. Readers should consult a solicitor for legal advice on specific matters. Artists can get free online legal information from Artquest.