What if there has been a creative partnership between two artists and one of them wishes to leave?

If one artist leaves the collaboration, can the other artist to continue the work alone?

The remaining artist should acknowledge the other collaborator’s joint authorship in some way.  Strictly speaking, the remaining artist should also secure the collaborator’s agreement for the continuation and development of this joint work; but where the collaborator has unilaterally broken the original collaborative agreement with the remaining artist (and may well owe the latter an element of the expenses incurred in making the art work), the remaining artist may wish to consider proceeding without such further agreement from the collaborator and await contact from that collaborator objecting to this being done.

In this case, the remaining artist should be in a strong bargaining position, and could, for example, insist on receiving the collaborator’s permission for the continuation and development of the joint work in exchange for the artist continuing with the project and releasing the collaborator from a breach of the original agreement and any money owed. Such an agreement would best be secured in writing signed by both artists.

0
Still need help? Contact us

Similar Artlaw articles


Related articles / resources


Related External Resources


Featured project

Peer Forum

Peer Forum is an annual seed-funding programme to help artists establish their own peer mentoring groups. Groups are hosted by galleries in London.   This slideshow requires JavaScript. Peer grou… Continue Reading Peer Forum

Read more


Comments

This article is from the Artlaw Archive of Henry Lydiate's columns published in Art Monthly since 1976, and may contain out of date material. The article is for information only, and not for the purpose of providing legal advice. Readers should consult a solicitor for legal advice on specific matters. Artists can get free online legal information from Artquest.